Michael Easley inContext Logo
Search
  • Podcast
  • Connect
  • About
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Podcast
  • Connect
  • About
  • Donate
  • Shop
$0.00 0 Cart
  • Ask Dr. E

Are Biblical Hermeneutics at Odds With Dispensational Theology?

with Michael Easley
  • Ask Dr. E

Are Biblical Hermeneutics at Odds With Dispensational Theology?

with Michael Easley
Your browser does not support the audio element.
Q: Can you talk about a biblical hermeneutic and some ways it might be at odds with dispensational theology?

Are Biblical Hermeneutics at Odds With Dispensational Theology?

 Hi Dr. E, you recently described reformed theology and I found that incredibly helpful! Can you talk about a biblical hermeneutic and some ways it might be at odds with dispensational theology?

Excerpt From The Answer

I love this opening statement we’ve used over the years:

The teaching and foundation of [ name of the church] is based on the Scriptures. This “Statement of Faith” reflects doctrines that are essential to understand, teach, and practice God’s Word. We approach the interpretation of Bible (hermeneutics) through a normal, grammatical, literal, historic, and theological lens.

  • Normal – understanding the words of Bible in their common usage unless otherwise indicated by the context.
  • Grammatical – using the recognized rules of grammar in interpretation.
  • Literal – understanding the meaning of Bible in its ordinary sense unless the context requires a figurative interpretation.
  • Historical – understanding the words of Bible in the context in which they were written.
  • Theological – a consistent consideration of the whole of Bible when drawing theological positions.

To me, these form an excellent way of the attempt to have a biblical hermeneutic. Obviously, I’ve talked at length over the years about why this matters and my go-to illustration has been the Abrahamic Covenant. From God’s unilateral promise to Abraham, Gen. 12, 15, 17, 19 and onward, we have God’s clear promises made and explained and expanded in understanding. So this, for e.g., is why I maintain Israel and the Land are still part of God’s promises. He has not changed or rescinded His covenant.

Dispensationalism, just like covenant or reformed theology, has many adherents and nuances that even those within these camps disagree. Eschatology is perhaps an area that finds most disagreement and even within dispensational v. covenant, you do not find uniform agreement. So this caution is pressing how we do theology too far unless we have a consistent view of the Scripture.

To hear Dr. E’s full answer, listen to the podcast or watch on Youtube!

Find more episodes of Ask Dr. E here.

Call or text us your question at 615-281-9694 or email at question@michaelincontext.com.

Listen on your favorite podcast app

Continue Series

Is Apostolic Succession Biblical?

Scripture, not apostolic succession or church tradition, is the foundation of Christ’s church and the believer’s confidence in salvation.

Read More »
Why Are There So Many Christian Denominations?

Why do Christians disagree? Dr. Easley explains essentials, unity, church authority, and why making disciples must remain the Church’s mission.

Read More »
If Jesus Was Fully God on Earth, How Was He Able to Coexist With Sinful People?

Why did Jesus have to be fully God and fully man? Dr. E explains the incarnation and why it makes our redemption possible.

Read More »

Topics

  • Biblical Teaching, Theology

References

Tags

  • Biblical hermeneutics, Dispensational theology, theology
Search
PODCAST
  • Series
  • Episodes
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
CONNECT
  • Ask Dr. E
  • Speaking
  • Biblical Tours
  • FAQs
BLOG
ABOUT
DONATE
SHOP
  • Cart
  • Checkout

Join Our List

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Michael Easley inContext logo
Copyright 2025 © Michael Easley inContext. All rights Reserved. Design by Luum